Payment statuses
Track 0Base checkout and payment-intent statuses without overclaiming live settlement.
Payment statuses are the control plane for fulfillment. A production 0Base integration stores raw statuses, maps them to customer-safe labels, processes signed events idempotently, and uses read/report repair when notifications are delayed.
0Base availability is account-gated. Build against capabilities, merchant status, environment mode, and settlement settings instead of assuming that every payment method, asset, network, cadence, or refund path is enabled for every merchant.
0Base product docs and API details
These pages are public product guidance for merchant and platform developers. 0Base endpoint-level API pages are not published for partners yet; use this product documentation to understand the workflow, records, and launch boundaries.
End-to-end picture
This flow is intentionally shown as product infrastructure: Created -> Requires payment -> Payment detected -> Confirming -> Processing -> Terminal state. The merchant application can make the customer experience simple, but the backend should keep each step visible enough for retries, support, and finance closeout.
Production contract
| Boundary | What to build | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Raw status | Persist created, requires_payment, payment_detected, confirming, processing, succeeded, failed, and cancelled. | You cannot debug what you did not store. |
| Customer label | Map raw states to clear UI copy. | Avoids exposing implementation detail. |
| Fulfillment rule | Terminal success is the normal fulfillment trigger. | Prevents early shipment. |
| History | Append status transitions with source and timestamp. | Support can reconstruct the timeline. |
| Recovery | Use reads and reports to recover from missed events. | Webhook delivery is asynchronous. |
Status and state handling
| State | What it means | Developer action |
|---|---|---|
| created | Object exists. | Do not fulfill. |
| requires_payment | Customer action required. | Show instructions. |
| payment_detected/confirming/processing | Payment path is underway. | Show pending. |
| succeeded/failed/cancelled | Terminal state. | Fulfill or recover. |
Status handling should be strict even when the customer UI is friendly. Store raw 0Base statuses, map them to customer-safe labels at the edge, and keep the merchant order state separate from the payment object state. That separation lets you change customer copy without corrupting reconciliation.
Example implementation record
This is an application-side record shape for payment statuses. Keep exact request and response fields aligned with your enabled account contract when 0Base API access is released for your partner account; the point of this record is to keep product, support, and finance joined in your system.
{
"payment_intent_id": "pi_live_456",
"current_status": "confirming",
"customer_label": "Payment is confirming",
"history": [
{
"status": "created",
"source": "api",
"at": "2026-06-28T20:00:00Z"
},
{
"status": "payment_detected",
"source": "webhook",
"at": "2026-06-28T20:04:10Z"
}
],
"fulfillment_state": "pending"
}Operational scenario
The worst payment-status bug is a friendly label replacing the real state. Store both. Customers need simple language, while support and finance need exact state, timestamp, event id, and object id.
In practice, production 0Base integrations make the happy path fast while keeping exceptions predictable: retries return the same object, delayed notifications can be repaired, expired sessions do not become mystery payments, and finance exports can be traced back to the original merchant order.
Before and after
| Before 0Base | With 0Base |
|---|---|
Status was a single boolean paid. | Status history tracks every meaningful transition. |
| Payment detected shipped goods. | Terminal success ships goods. |
| Cancelled and failed were merged. | Different recovery paths remain available. |
| Webhook state overwrote newer reads. | Handlers compare event time/current state before applying changes. |
Evidence to keep
| Evidence | What to store |
|---|---|
| Status history | Raw status, source, event id/request id, timestamp. |
| Mapping table | Raw status to customer label, support label, fulfillment action. |
| Terminal decision | Which raw status changed order/fulfillment state. |
| Recovery reads | API read/report that repaired missed delivery. |
| Exception record | Out-of-order, duplicate, or invalid event handling. |
This evidence is what makes the integration supportable at institutional scale. A developer should not need private operational knowledge to answer basic questions such as what the customer saw, which object owns the state, which event announced the change, and which ledger or report row closed the money movement.
Failure modes and recovery
| Failure mode | Recovery |
|---|---|
| Duplicate webhook | Dedupe event id and return success without side effects. |
| Out-of-order event | Read current object state before applying. |
| Status unknown to client | Fail closed: show pending/support and log for review. |
| Cancelled order receives success later | Apply merchant late-payment policy with full evidence. |
Recovery should be idempotent and explainable. When the system is uncertain, preserve the current raw status, read the latest object state, attach a support reference, and avoid changing fulfillment or finance state until a trusted terminal condition is present.
API adjacency
| API area | Use it for |
|---|---|
GET /payment_intents/{intentId} | Read status. |
GET /payment_intents?status=... | Build status queues. |
GET /webhooks/deliveries | Inspect delivery state. |
GET /reports/transactions | Cross-check status totals. |
For endpoint-level implementation, use the API reference as the source of truth for fields, enums, authentication, idempotency behavior, pagination, and response examples.
Why this matters for merchants and customers
Payment statuses are the difference between a polished checkout and a reliable checkout. Storing raw state prevents early fulfillment, duplicate effects, and support confusion.
At scale, the value of 0Base is not only that a payment can be created. The value is that the payment can be explained later: what the customer saw, which account capabilities allowed it, which backend state changed, which notification delivered it, and which ledger or report row closed it.
Worked API path
The example below shows the implementation shape for this page. Use merchant-specific capabilities, account settings, and API responses in production; the ids and values here are illustrative.
curl -X GET https://base-api-sandbox.0bit.app/v1/payment_intents/pi_test_456 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OBIT_SECRET_KEY"Example response shape:
{
"intentId": "pi_test_456",
"status": "processing",
"amount": "89.00",
"currency": "EUR",
"cryptoCurrency": "USDT",
"clientReference": "ord_100045",
"conversionTxId": "conv_test_123",
"quotedRate": "1.08450000",
"cryptoAmount": "96.52000000"
}Implementation checkpoints:
- Store your merchant reference before calling 0Base.
- Attach the returned object id to the same business record.
- Record the request id, idempotency key, raw status, and environment.
- Use webhook and report reads to repair delayed or missed state changes.
Data join map
This join map is the reason 0Base is infrastructure rather than a payment button. A merchant can change checkout UX, support tooling, or finance exports without losing the chain from customer action to backend state and settlement evidence.
Operator runbook
| Signal | Check first | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Customer reports payment not updating | Look up merchant order id, 0Base object id, raw status, and latest webhook delivery. | Read current object state before changing fulfillment. |
| Webhook delivery failed | Check delivery id, event id, attempts, last error, and handler logs. | Fix the handler, replay once, and dedupe by event id. |
| Finance cannot match a row | Compare client reference, intent id, settlement id, report period, and export row. | Move the item to reconciliation queue instead of closing by amount/date. |
The runbook should be available to support and finance teams before launch. A developer integration is not complete if only engineering can explain the state of a customer payment.
Developer checklist
- Store raw status and label separately.
- Append transition history.
- Make fulfillment rules explicit.
- Dedupe webhook events.
- Have a polling/report repair path.
- Test every status in sandbox or controlled fixtures.