Global customer payments
Use 0Base only for approved countries, assets, networks, and payment methods.
Global customer payments are one of the strongest reasons for 0Base: merchants can present a consistent checkout model to customers who may prefer crypto or stablecoin payment methods, while the merchant keeps one operational model for status, support, settlement, and reports.
0Base availability is account-gated. Build against capabilities, merchant status, environment mode, and settlement settings instead of assuming that every payment method, asset, network, cadence, or refund path is enabled for every merchant.
0Base product docs and API details
These pages are public product guidance for merchant and platform developers. 0Base endpoint-level API pages are not published for partners yet; use this product documentation to understand the workflow, records, and launch boundaries.
End-to-end picture
This flow is intentionally shown as product infrastructure: Customer market -> Capabilities filter -> Checkout object -> Payment status -> Merchant fulfillment -> Settlement report. The merchant application can make the customer experience simple, but the backend should keep each step visible enough for retries, support, and finance closeout.
Production contract
| Boundary | What to build | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Market-aware display | Use capabilities and merchant policy before showing payment methods in a market. | Avoids unsupported or misleading options. |
| Currency clarity | Separate customer display currency, payment crypto currency, and settlement currency. | Global checkout needs explicit amounts. |
| Language and support | Customer copy should explain pending, confirming, failed, and expired states without rail jargon. | Reduces support burden. |
| Compliance boundary | Account approval and merchant policy decide where checkout is exposed. | Product UI should not infer availability from geography alone. |
| Reconciliation | Global payments still close through object ids and reports. | Finance gets one process across markets. |
Status and state handling
| State | What it means | Developer action |
|---|---|---|
| Created/open | Object exists and the merchant can show the customer a payment path. | Do not fulfill from creation alone. |
| Payment detected | A customer payment signal exists but final state is not complete. | Show pending and preserve evidence. |
| Processing/confirming | 0Base is still moving through confirmation or settlement logic where enabled. | Keep the merchant order locked. |
| Succeeded/completed | Terminal success for the payment object. | Fulfill, ledger, and export. |
Status handling should be strict even when the customer UI is friendly. Store raw 0Base statuses, map them to customer-safe labels at the edge, and keep the merchant order state separate from the payment object state. That separation lets you change customer copy without corrupting reconciliation.
Example implementation record
This is an application-side record shape for global customer payments. Keep exact request and response fields aligned with your enabled account contract when 0Base API access is released for your partner account; the point of this record is to keep product, support, and finance joined in your system.
{
"customer_country": "market_allowed_by_merchant_policy",
"display_currency": "EUR",
"crypto_currency": "USDT",
"network": "capability_network",
"settlement_currency": "USDC",
"payment_intent_id": "pi_live_456",
"support_locale": "en"
}Operational scenario
Before 0Base, international crypto checkout often meant custom wallet instructions per market and manual reconciliation. 0Base gives developers a standard payment object model so the merchant can expand carefully without rebuilding operations for every country.
In practice, production 0Base integrations make the happy path fast while keeping exceptions predictable: retries return the same object, delayed notifications can be repaired, expired sessions do not become mystery payments, and finance exports can be traced back to the original merchant order.
Before and after
| Before 0Base | With 0Base |
|---|---|
| Each market had a different payment instruction template. | Capabilities drive one checkout object model. |
| Customer asset and merchant settlement were confused. | Display, payment, and settlement currencies are separate. |
| Support needed local provider knowledge. | Support starts from 0Base ids and raw status. |
| Finance closed each market differently. | Reports and ledger rows normalize closeout. |
Evidence to keep
| Evidence | What to store |
|---|---|
| Capability evidence | Payment methods/assets/networks active for the account. |
| Customer evidence | Locale, displayed amount/currency, checkout version. |
| Payment evidence | Intent id, status, crypto currency, network. |
| Settlement evidence | Settlement currency, ledger id, report period. |
| Policy evidence | Merchant market rules and account-gated availability decision. |
This evidence is what makes the integration supportable at institutional scale. A developer should not need private operational knowledge to answer basic questions such as what the customer saw, which object owns the state, which event announced the change, and which ledger or report row closed the money movement.
Failure modes and recovery
| Failure mode | Recovery |
|---|---|
| Customer market unsupported | Do not render checkout; show alternate payment/support path. |
| Customer chooses unavailable network | Filter before rendering; never issue unsupported instructions. |
| Locale copy hides expiry | Make amount and expiry explicit in all locales. |
| Report totals need market view | Store market/customer reference in merchant order and join to reports. |
Recovery should be idempotent and explainable. When the system is uncertain, preserve the current raw status, read the latest object state, attach a support reference, and avoid changing fulfillment or finance state until a trusted terminal condition is present.
API adjacency
| API area | Use it for |
|---|---|
GET /capabilities/payment_methods | Payment availability. |
GET /capabilities/networks | Network availability. |
POST /checkouts | Create market checkout. |
GET /reports/transactions | Global reconciliation. |
For endpoint-level implementation, use the API reference as the source of truth for fields, enums, authentication, idempotency behavior, pagination, and response examples.
Why this matters for merchants and customers
Global customer payments are where 0Base can matter most: merchants can accept approved digital payment options from customers in more places while keeping one status, support, and reconciliation model.
At scale, the value of 0Base is not only that a payment can be created. The value is that the payment can be explained later: what the customer saw, which account capabilities allowed it, which backend state changed, which notification delivered it, and which ledger or report row closed it.
Worked API path
The example below shows the implementation shape for this page. Use merchant-specific capabilities, account settings, and API responses in production; the ids and values here are illustrative.
curl -X POST https://base-api-sandbox.0bit.app/v1/payment_intents \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OBIT_SECRET_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: ord_100045:base:v1" \
-d '
{
"amount": "89.00",
"currency": "EUR",
"cryptoCurrency": "USDT",
"clientReference": "ord_100045",
"settlementCurrency": "USDC",
"settlementRail": "onchain"
}'Example response shape:
{
"intentId": "pi_test_456",
"status": "requires_payment",
"amount": "89.00",
"currency": "EUR",
"cryptoCurrency": "USDT",
"clientReference": "ord_100045",
"settlementCurrency": "USDC",
"settlementRail": "onchain"
}Implementation checkpoints:
- Store your merchant reference before calling 0Base.
- Attach the returned object id to the same business record.
- Record the request id, idempotency key, raw status, and environment.
- Use webhook and report reads to repair delayed or missed state changes.
Data join map
This join map is the reason 0Base is infrastructure rather than a payment button. A merchant can change checkout UX, support tooling, or finance exports without losing the chain from customer action to backend state and settlement evidence.
Operator runbook
| Signal | Check first | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Customer reports payment not updating | Look up merchant order id, 0Base object id, raw status, and latest webhook delivery. | Read current object state before changing fulfillment. |
| Webhook delivery failed | Check delivery id, event id, attempts, last error, and handler logs. | Fix the handler, replay once, and dedupe by event id. |
| Finance cannot match a row | Compare client reference, intent id, settlement id, report period, and export row. | Move the item to reconciliation queue instead of closing by amount/date. |
| Customer paid but order is still pending | Check raw intent status, deposit-address status, confirmations, and latest report row. | Keep fulfillment pending until terminal success or documented manual review. |
The runbook should be available to support and finance teams before launch. A developer integration is not complete if only engineering can explain the state of a customer payment.
Developer checklist
- Gate display by capabilities and merchant policy.
- Keep currency fields explicit.
- Avoid global coverage claims.
- Localize status copy without changing raw statuses.
- Store market/customer references outside sensitive payment fields.
- Run reports by merchant order metadata and intent ids.